14用户正在阅读这个话题 (在过去的30分钟)
0成员14游客
0成员14游客
Lo más popular ahora:
#ReviveCS - Proposal (24 usuarios)
1.6 reward campaing (21 usuarios)
CBA PathBlood 1.8.0 (18 usuarios)
TIW 2020 Map votes (13 usuarios)
RCB Gold 2013 v4 (11 usuarios)
New CBA Hero now supports HD / D... (10 usuarios)
Error installing package (Error:... (10 usuarios)
Temas más activos de la semana:
#ReviveCS - Proposal (45 mensajes)
New CBA Hero now supports HD / D... (8 mensajes)
my version shows as 1.0C and oth... (7 mensajes)
Voobly disappearing without erro... (7 mensajes)
AYUDA!! LOST CONNECTION TO THE S... (6 mensajes)
1.6 Out of sync without any play... (4 mensajes)
Setting up port forwarding in r... (3 mensajes)
1v1 has 3 Blood scenarios, one of which xCs voted in (8 scenarios in total), meaning 2/8 scenarios may be an unknown Blood, a minority.
25% - 38% total.
2v2 has 5 Blood scenarios, one of which xCs voted in (10 scenarios in total), meaning 4/8 scenarios may be an unknown Blood, however xCs is definitely very knowledgable of Gwarz, so really 3/10 unknown Bloods, still a minority.
33% - 50% total.
TG section has 9 Blood scenarios, three of which xCs voted in (18 scenarios in total), meaning 6/18 scenarios may be an unknown Blood, and again counting out Gwarz lowers that to 5/18 unknown Bloods in reality, still a minority.
28% - 50% total.
There is no bias (towards xCs), there is not even a majority (almost) and especially unnecessary complaints when your own clan has decided to cast 5 votes out of your 20 to Blood scenarios. Which is also 25% and a very close turnout to actually how many Blood scenarios you might not know.
Can confirm. Only RB is behind closed doors with Army and plotting stuff regarding running this event.
You proved xCs full roster beats Dy & Eot without theirs. We still likely wont have ours for this but some people just move on from the game and theres nothing you can do about that.
25% - 38% total.
2v2 has 5 Blood scenarios, one of which xCs voted in (10 scenarios in total), meaning 4/8 scenarios may be an unknown Blood, however xCs is definitely very knowledgable of Gwarz, so really 3/10 unknown Bloods, still a minority.
33% - 50% total.
TG section has 9 Blood scenarios, three of which xCs voted in (18 scenarios in total), meaning 6/18 scenarios may be an unknown Blood, and again counting out Gwarz lowers that to 5/18 unknown Bloods in reality, still a minority.
28% - 50% total.
There is no bias (towards xCs), there is not even a majority (almost) and especially unnecessary complaints when your own clan has decided to cast 5 votes out of your 20 to Blood scenarios. Which is also 25% and a very close turnout to actually how many Blood scenarios you might not know.
Thanks for making such a strong effort to prove that this tournament has no bias. Unfortunately, you only considered the votes and not the rules. For example, CBA and CBA Hero require 2 votes each (4 votes total), and Dodgeball requires only 2 votes for both versions to be included. So why is CBA/Hero being treated the same as dodgeball? Because they are similar? So are most bloods. On top of that, this tournament host is trying to apply the same rule to lustful and zotten. Why? Who is he listening to?
11111
(sorry for this Fugs bunny)
I think this empirically proves that Dodgeball shouldn't be in twice. Army even specified dodgeball as an example of maps that would only be in once and that teams who pick the map as a home map could choose the version.
Instead now, it's in twice, so other teams have to use twice as many veto's if they don't wanna play this crappy map, and it has double the chance of popping up in the decider round........
Anyhow, we've all accepted this already, but somehow Gary still feels like Dodgeball players are being punished??
How??
+1
It is unfortunate that all rules were not made clear before and that we are still discussing some, although as already mentioned by others it was highly probable that the existing rules from previous TIWs carry over to this one, maybe with slight modifications.
Another interesting discussion point by Frankie.
(note: this would only affect non-seeded clans which are RB, 300, IC, Simply)
"Being able to pick both CBA and CBA Hero in the same round for non-seeded clans."
To which RB replied with: "Non-seeded clans should be able to pick whatever they want."
Non-seeded clans are already considered weaker clans and as someone already mentioned there probably is only 10% chance or less for any of them to make it to the Gold semifinals. At least two non-seeded clans depend a lot on being able to play CBA and CBA Hero (especially 300), bear in mind there is only one immunity and vetoes that can be used to remove one of those reliable home picks, which still the leaves the non-seeded clans in a situation where they have only one of their best maps and then only moderately bad or even horrible maps to choose from.
You also forgot that only clans non-seeded could use immunity, but it seems that now some people seem to choose which TIW 2016 rules suit them more, and which ones dont.
@@Army, in the rule of only immunity to CBA Hero, only 3 clans didnt want(4 in favor), and you didnt take that rule into account (very fair btw), why now rules are imposed with the agreement of only those 3 clans? I do not understand.