Your map looks only useful for same civ games. Never liked side vs side spots on CBA, imo it basically ****s the weaker civ team, as ghosty said it removes strategy on the map.
I would personally love to see a CBA map with the new civs be played.
Say that again when youre huns as p8 with two enemies on both sides Same civ ****s the team with the weaker players. I know youre a good player obi but if you think about it you will see that what you said makes little sense.
Might I suggest one thing though, perhaps you could make a rated version that dos 12121212 spots instead so as to keep strategy without 4v1 situations.
So? In your same example there could be a more important civ on the other side getting rushed as well, making it even trade. Lets not make hypothetical scenarios as arguments. The fact is, that rushing civs like celts viks teuts goths, will have a harder time rushing on side vs side games, making them legit worthless.
startegies such as encouraging team play, CBA is a team game not a one man rush show you know?
You dont have to play it if you dont like it. Theres still amazing CBA versions on Steam where you play now I heard.
Side v Side will be perfect for competitive games, However its clear that a huge majority of CBA/CBA Hero players do not want fair games for whatever reason. I mean people at 2k do FMT vs 18+ guys, they rather win at all costs and get the points than have a competitive game.
This ver is perfect for tournaments and inter clan games.
startegies such as encouraging team play, CBA is a team game not a one man rush show you know?
Because rushing doesn't require synergy nor team work, right?
Quote:
You dont have to play it if you dont like it. Theres still amazing CBA versions on Steam where you play now I heard.
I see you ran out of arguments, and already turned into cheap attacks, nice way to prove your point
Don't worry, if people don't play your map, you can always go back to GR where I'm sure people would love it.
I would personally love to see a CBA map with the new civs be played.
I mean ally enemy ally enemy etc. or am I misreading this.
I actually like Barry's idea, ally-enemy-ally or ally-ally-enemy-enemy etc., mirror positions but not sides vs sides is much better gameplay wise.
You dont have to play it if you dont like it. Theres still amazing CBA versions on Steam where you play now I heard.
You dont have to play it if you dont like it. Theres still amazing CBA versions on Steam where you play now I heard.
Side v Side will be perfect for competitive games, However its clear that a huge majority of CBA/CBA Hero players do not want fair games for whatever reason. I mean people at 2k do FMT vs 18+ guys, they rather win at all costs and get the points than have a competitive game.
This ver is perfect for tournaments and inter clan games.
p.s dont force people to play the maps you make without voting them in somehow like your blueblood.
Because rushing doesn't require synergy nor team work, right?
I see you ran out of arguments, and already turned into cheap attacks, nice way to prove your point
Don't worry, if people don't play your map, you can always go back to GR where I'm sure people would love it.