No, nothing personal, but if everybody that comes with a rescuer patch has to be voted, then we can have the most inconstant game that has ever been done.
Personally I love what voobly has done for the game, but (for me) everything has to be external, not internal, this is a game supporter, not microsoft itself and we dont need beeing rescued by no one. I like playing AOT, if we start changing little things of the game itself the next thing is changing big things until the games change, patchs are alternatives not priorities.
I also think this is a vanity act, while if it was done by a group of experts, the patch would have more fiability. This guy has act alone, pretending that in a simple forum not visited by majority by 10% of the game community takes a decision. If you want to do experiments its ok, but dont involucrate and less put at the force your experiments.
Its funny your rmdm dm map, thats for you? its not a bad idea, but that patch is done by someone for someone, and its not for the community.
Personally I love what voobly has done for the game, but (for me) everything has to be external, not internal, this is a game supporter, not microsoft itself and we dont need beeing rescued by no one. I like playing AOT, if we start changing little things of the game itself the next thing is changing big things until the games change, patchs are alternatives not priorities.
I also think this is a vanity act, while if it was done by a group of experts, the patch would have more fiability. This guy has act alone, pretending that in a simple forum not visited by majority by 10% of the game community takes a decision. If you want to do experiments its ok, but dont involucrate and less put at the force your experiments.
Its funny your rmdm dm map, thats for you? its not a bad idea, but that patch is done by someone for someone, and its not for the community.